Monday, December 19, 2011

10 Benefits from LinkedIn for Sales People and Business Owners

For business owners, account managers, business development managers and anyone else who is in sales, these are the benefits LinkedIn can bring you:
1. Identifying the right people at a customer or prospect (finding their profile)
2. Receiving introductions or referrals to prospects (via the introductions tool or outside LinkedIn)
3. Receiving referrals to other departments at current customers (via the introductions tool or outside LinkedIn)


Tuesday, June 28, 2011

What is Google’s Sandbox?


The Google Sandbox Effect is a theory used to explain why newly-registered domains or domains with frequent ownership changes rank poorly in Google Search Engine Results Pages (SERPS). In other words new websites are put into a “sandbox” or a holding area and have their search ratings on hold until they can prove worthy of ranking.
Once Google deems a website to be of quality and importance the website will be removed from the Sandbox and can potentially show up high in Google Search Engine Results Pages. Webmasters can do numerous things to improve their website with Google, but time really is the key in getting out of the Sandbox. Sandbox believers say it can take anywhere from 6 months to a year and sometimes longer before Google will promote a website out of the Sandbox.
Because Google does not acknowledge the Sandbox and it has not been clearly proven the Sandbox Effect is just a theory. Even though it is just a theory, the Sandbox is believed by the majority of webmasters. The Sandbox is believed to have come about in 2004 when changes to Google’s Algorithm made it so new websites were banned from the top of Google Search Engine Results Pages (SERPS).
It may seem that the Sandbox is unfair to newly launched websites, but Google created the Sandbox with good reasons. Google was trying to discourage spam sites from quickly reaching the top of Search Results, getting dropped off Google, creating a new site and repeatedly showing up high in Search Results. In the past, companies would put up a promotional website for a short period of time and once the promotion was over the website was gone. These promotional websites would still show up high inGoogle Search Engine Results even after they were removed, causing many broken links and unhappy Google searchers.
Even with the Sandbox Effect it is still possible for newly launched websites to make it to the top of Google Search Engine Results Pages (SERPS). If Google deems a new website of being worthy it can be seen in Search Engine Results immediately, but it can still take up to 6 months for the website to rank to its fullest potential. There are many ways in which web designers use to avoid the Sandbox, some of which are discussed below. But because of its uncertainty, even if all algorithm variables are followed there is still no way to guarantee new websites from being put in the Sandbox.

Thanks
Rohit

How to start SEO of a new website - Some Imp Tips from Rohit Shelwante


1)      Create unique, accurate page titles (each page should have unique title, description)
2)      Use Static URL’s for each page instead of Dynamic so it becomes easy for google to read the URL
3)      Make use of Sitemap.xml to help google spider and Sitemap on the website for the visitor to Navigate the website easily
4)      Try to offer Quality Content and services
5)      Make minimum use of Images, if used then use Image Alt
6)      Try to not to use flash or Java script as this makes a problem for spiders to understand
7)      While development, make use of H1 – H2 Tags (H1 Should be used only once on a every single page, if absolutely             needed then only go for 2 H1 Tags)
8)      Create a robots.txt file for blocking the spiders to crawl specific areas of the website
9)      Make single page for every service so that it becomes us to target the keyword and bring it ASAP in the top google          ranking
10)   Keep as much good and quality content you have.
11)  Try to give as much information to the visitor about the product. (For Ex PDF Brochures, Video’s)
12)   Keep a lot of interlinking so that the visitor remains on the website for a longer time and can navigate on the website easily
13)  Design the website in such a way that the user should not take more then 4 clicks to reach the targeted page
14)   Use no follow tags where necessary
15)  Make sure that the content on the website is not duplicate or copied from some where. Google hammers a lot for that
16)   Once all the pages are ready, do not try to upload all at the same time, for ex: if you create a website of 100 pages, then upload 20 pages each day and not 100 in 1 day, that might make google confuse.
17)   Use Google Webmaster to check out broken links and replace them ASAP


Thanks


Monday, February 14, 2011

0 Creative Uses of the New Facebook Profile [PICS]

Facebook users are showing off some serious creativity by taking advantage of the new profile page photo layout.
French artist Alexandre Oudin (below) has been identified as the creator of the craze, and more and more designs are now emerging. People have been playing around with their profile pics since Facebook first launched, but the new redesign allows for some inspired fun including clever animations, typography and photography magic.
Have a look through our gallery of 10 of the best new Facebook profile pic hacks and share any cool creations that you’ve seen in the comments below. And if you’ve been getting crafty with your profile, we want to see it!

Is OkCupid's Dating Data Safe With Match.com?

There are millions of fish in the sea and, it seems, nearly as many online dating sites. But few have captured users' hearts quite the way OkCupid has. Launched in 2004 by a quartet of Harvard mathematicians, OkCupid has attracted more than 7 million users thanks to its low-cost, social-media-savvy, statistically driven approach to dating.
Unlike most dating sites, OkCupid lets users set up profiles and contact other members without having to pay fees. (A $10-per-month "A List" version lets members cruise ad-free profiles and access additional features.) Members can set up their own blogs, take quizzes, and compose questions for other users to answer. The company's popular blog, OkTrends, mines site data for trends and offers tongue-in-cheek relationship advice.
As a result, OkCupid has garnered a younger, more technologically plugged-in audience than conventional dating sites. But geeks aren't the only ones attracted to OkCupid. Internet dating giant Match.com was so smitten that it bought the site for $50 million earlier this month. That transaction has some OkCupid users a little worried.
Jesse W., a graduate student in Southern California who's been active on OkCupid since shortly after it launched, says "my heart was broken when I heard the news. I immediately posted about it on Facebook and called and texted my friends, who sent me their condolences. I won't advocate for the bully of online dating like I did when OkCupid's owners cared about its members."
OkCupid's fans were not reassured by the immediate disappearance of an OkTrends blog entry from last April (you can find a cached copy here). Titled "Why you should never pay for online dating," the blog post by OkCupid cofounder Christian Rudder accused for-pay dating sites eHarmony and Match.com of misleading consumers with statistics that don't accurately represent their success rates.
OkCupid's CEO, Sam Yagan, says that he decided to remove the blog post on his own, deeming it to contain inaccurate assumptions about the other sites' data. "It was the common sense thing to do," he says. He also maintains that OkCupid will continue to operate separately from Match.com and be free for most users.
The question then becomes, what happens to the trove of personal data that OkCupid has amassed?
Whose Data Is It, Anyway?
Not surprisingly for a site founded by math geeks, OkCupid is extremely data driven.
The site's OkTrends blog employs sophisticated statistical analysis to offer advice on topics like how guys can tell whether their odds of scoring on a first date are better or worse than average (ask her if she likes the taste of beer), which digital cameras make people look the hottest (Panasonic's Micro4/3s), and what the biggest lies told by online daters are (how much money they make and how tall they are).
As on some competing sites, data is what feeds the algorithms that OkCupid uses to suggest good matches. Last June, for example, the site introduced a feature making it possible for people who are rated attractive by other members to receive suggestions only for similarly attractive members.
A lot of this data comes from aggregating clickstreams on the site, measuring which kinds of profiles or pictures elicit the greatest number of responses. Some of it also comes from OkCupid's unique Questions feature. While nearly all dating sites employ some kind of questionnaire--and some, like eHarmony's, are notoriously extensive--few can match the depth of personal information that OkCupid members reveal via their answers.
Largely created by the members themselves, the questions range from the mundane ("How do you feel about kids?") to queries about religion, politics, sexual practices, drug use, STDs, and more. For example: "What's your relationship with marijuana?" and "Would you rather a) be tied up during sex, b) do the tying, or c) avoid bondage altogether?"
Though you can mark your answers as private and thereby make them inaccessible to anyone else, by default they are public. When you view another member's profile, you can see which public questions they've answered and how their responses compare to yours. You can also change your answers later, make public answers private, or delete them entirely.
Answering publicly is what helps you find good matches, says Katherine L., who joined OkCupid a year ago.
"Whatever your 'thing' or 'kink' is, you want to find people who can enjoy it with you," she says. "It really is an awesome tool for finding a huge diversity of people, from the fundamentally religious to the really strange."
Now all of that data is in the hands of Match.com's parent company, InterActive Corp (IAC). In addition to Match.com, IAC owns more than 50 Web properties, including such popular sites as Ask.com, The Daily Beast, College Humor, and City Search. It also owns Mindspark, which markets a range of browser toolbars, cursors, emoticons, screensavers, avatars, and online sweepstakes sites.
According to Match.com's privacy policy, the company reserves the right to share personally identifiable information with "other IAC businesses" and "other businesses with which we partner or which we carefully select to offer you products, services, and promotions through our website or offline." Users can opt out of receiving promotional e-mail and phone calls via their account settings.
However, Yagan insists that OkCupid's privacy policy--which limits the amount of data it shares with third parties--will continue to govern the data that the site collects.
"We are not planning to share any personally identifiable information with anyone," he says. "Just because we were acquired doesn't mean we're handing over any user data. Can I sign in blood and tell you that our privacy terms will not change for all of eternity? No. Can I tell you we have no plans to do anything with any of that data? Absolutely."
Match.com declined our request for an interview, but offered the following statement via a spokesperson: "Post-acquisition, the OkCupid privacy policy will continue to apply to OkCupid user data, just as it did pre-acquisition. At this time, we have no current plans to change the policy."
As any Facebook user can tell you, however, privacy policies are hardly written in stone.
"The fatal flaw in privacy policies is the fact that they can be changed at any time," says Paul Stephens, director of policy and advocacy for the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. "If there's anyone who has concerns about information they've shared with a site, they'd be well advised to remove or change that information while they still have the opportunity."
Breaking Up Is Hard to Do
Most OkCupid users contacted for this story said that they would consider leaving the site if it mined their personal data for marketing purposes. Others like Nikkie H. seemed resigned to the risks of sharing personal information online.
"I look at Facebook and how the online advertisers seem to know everything about me, given how they've customized the ads [and] I've almost become desensitized to it all," she says. "My way of thinking is, you should never assume anything you say online will be private even if they say it will be. It's just like you should never assume telling your best friend a secret will stay a secret. More than likely they have shared your secret to someone else within two hours."
Nicole G., a former user of Match.com who compares it to "a business school barbecue," was less sanguine.
"As soon as I heard the news, I e-mailed my boyfriend of three months, whom I met on OkC," she says. "We've had some ups and downs lately. My e-mail: 'Well, guess we should definitely stay together now, because Match.com just bought OkCupid.' "

How Mark Zuckerberg Turned Facebook Into the Web's Hottest Platform

He didn't have much choice but to sell. It was summer 2006, a little more than two years after Mark Zuckerberg had created Facebook in his Harvard dorm room as a way for him and his friends to better connect with schoolmates. In the intervening years, he'd raised $37.7 million from venture capitalists and transformed his modest Web site into a certified social phenomenon. College kids across the nation clamored for access, which Zuckerberg doled out, school by school. By mid-2006, about 7 million users, most of them college students, had a Facebook account.
But for all of Facebook's success, there were also signs of trouble. Zuckerberg wanted the site to be more than a campus thing. He wanted to supplant and surpass MySpace and make Facebook the largest social network on the planet. He wanted it to become the next Google, a site that people of all ages would find useful in their daily lives. But that hadn't happened. Facebook had cornered the market for college students, but its 11-month-old effort to capture the attention of high school students — and take users away from MySpace — was going nowhere. Indeed, Facebook's growth was leveling off, inching its way toward 8 million members, while MySpace's continued to surge, with 100 million members in August of 2006.

At the same time, suitors like Viacom and Microsoft had begun to take a serious look at Facebook, and they were tossing out numbers with lots of zeroes. Some investors and executives began wondering if it was time for Zuckerberg to sell. It was starting to look like Facebook had peaked.
Zuckerberg disagreed, but when Yahoo came calling with a bid of $1 billion in cash, the pressure became too much. He relented in July, verbally agreeing to sell Facebook to Yahoo. Strategically, it seemed like a good match. Yahoo had hundreds of millions of users, but its foray into social networking was struggling. Facebook had cool tools and was looking for a mass audience.
The timing, however, couldn't have been worse. In the days after Zuckerberg agreed to sell, Yahoo announced it was projecting slower sales and earnings growth, and that the launch of its new advertising platform would be delayed. Its stock price plunged 22 percent overnight. Terry Semel, Yahoo's CEO at the time, reacted by cutting his offer from $1 billion to $800 million. Zuckerberg, who had been warned about Semel's reputation for last-minute renegotiations, walked away. Two months later, Semel reissued the original $1 billion bid, but by then Zuckerberg had convinced his board and executive team that Yahoo wasn't a serious partner and that Facebook would be worth more on its own. He rejected the offer and became famous as the cocky youngster who turned down $1 billion.
Today, Zuckerberg, 23, is famous for other reasons. For one thing, analysts think he could be the nation's richest man under 25, with a net worth estimated at $1.5 billion. But more important, he has transformed his company from second-tier social network to full-fledged platform that organizes the entire Internet. As a result, Facebook is the now most buzzed-about company in Silicon Valley, and Zuckerberg is constantly compared to visionaries like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Even some of the tech industry's most legendary figures are genuflecting before Zuckerberg. In an entry on his blog, Netscape cofounder Marc Andreessen called Facebook's transformation "an amazing achievement — one of the most significant milestones in the technology industry in this decade." Says Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce.com, "I'm in awe." (So am I. I have known one of Facebook's executives since childhood.)
As for those concerns that Facebook's membership had peaked? Well, now it's signing up nearly 1 million new users a week. By the end of August there were 36 million of them. And these aren't just the tweens or college kids you might suspect; the fastest-growing segment of Facebook users is over 35, a group that represents 11 percent of all site users. Total registrations have more than quadrupled over the previous year. The number of employees has tripled, as has revenue. And venture capitalists say that if Facebook were to go public today, investors would value it at more than $5 billion — five times what Yahoo had been prepared to pay.
But Zuckerberg's greatest contribution goes beyond Facebook's success. His company suggests a new model for how connection, communication, and commerce can work online — a radical and ambitious rethinking of the Internet's potential.
Zuckerberg's journey from snot-faced upstart to dotcom deity began in the summer of 2006, just after the demise of the first Yahoo bid. Zuckerberg won't speak directly about this time period, but associates and friends say that, for the first time in his career, the curly-haired tyro found himself facing immense external pressure. Sure, he'd retained control of his company for the time being, but he hadn't solved any of the problems that led him to consider a sale in the first place. Critics were accusing him of hubris and foolhardiness. He had something to prove.

Wow, Microsoft And Google Are Punching Each Other In The Face Right In Front Of Us!

By now, you’ve undoubtedly heard the news. Google set up a sting operation (how cool is that?) in an attempt to catch Microsoft red-handed stealing their search results. And according to them, they did just that — and made it known. Microsoft has seemingly both sidestepped and denied the claim — and then has sent accusations back Google’s way. The whole thing is amazing, and to be honest, I’m still trying to parse it all. But you can get the whole gist by reading what’s on Techmeme, starting with Danny Sullivan’s original post on the topic.
But what’s most interesting right now is that Google and Microsoft are engaged in a full-on war. Yes, they’ve more or less been at war for many years. But it’s mainly been a quiet war, that takes place behind the scenes and only occasionally includes quick jabs at the other one in public. But now they’re straight-up calling each other liars on Twitter, and their own very popular blogs!
After the news and subsequent fight first broke out this morning. Microsoft immediately put up a rebuttal on their Bing blog, entitled: Thoughts on search quality. That article directly addresses Sullivan’s post but doesn’t directly call out Google for much.

Facebook vs. Google: The Billion Dollar Battle to Be Your Default Social Profile

im Tobin is president of Ignite Social Media, where he works work with clients including Microsoft, Intel, Nature Made, The Body Shop, Disney and more implementing social media marketing strategies. He is also author of the book “Social Media is a Cocktail Party: Why You Already Know the Rules of Social Media Marketing.”
“What’s next in social media?” It’s among the most popular questions out there. But while most folks currently answer with “location-based services” (i.e. Foursquare, Gowalla) or “group purchasing” (i.e. Groupon, Twongo, Living Social), the real battle may be between Facebook and Google.
The fight between these two Internet giants to become your default social profile has been brewing for a long time, and the prize is an enormous potential revenue stream. Let’s take a closer look.

Team Facebook? Team Google?
Suddenly, whether Facebook or Google becomes the default social profile around the web has billion-dollar ramifications. Just ask credit card companies how much can be made by taking just a small percentage of all of those transactions. And with billions at stake, it’s likely to be a real battle ahead.
The winners may be all of us, because to compel us to connect using their services, both companies will have to think about providing a lot of genuine utility. When they get creative, we get better web experiences.
Get it right, make it secure, and I’m there.
Which social network do you think will ultimately triumph and why? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

For more articles, visit us on: www.appleface.co

Monday, January 10, 2011

How to Calculate Adsense revenue with Alexa rank

How to Calculate Adsense revenue with Alexa rank

Poking inside someone’s pocket or bank account is difficult and so is the case when you want to estimate adsense income of a blog or website. Everyone don’t display analytics stats on their website, so people keep guessing adsense revenue of bloggers and webmasters. Only tool to access the earning potential of a blog is Alexa. But that too only tells you the relative ranking but will not tell you the approximate stats. Here i have tried to approximate adsense income via Alexa.
STEP 1 - First go to the alexa rank of any website by going to Alexa.com. You will reach on a page which will show the traffic rank graph of the website like given below.
Alexa rank
STEP 2 – Click on the reach tab indicated by arrow in the figure given above. You will get a graph like given below.
Alexa reach
STEP 3 – Note down yesterday or 7 day average or whichever is available. This figure is known as User reach percentage  and indicates the percentage of internet users visiting this website daily out of total internet users in the world. Lets calculate number of internet users visiting this website (AmitBhawani.com). Yesterday reach is 0.034%  here.
Total number of internet users in the world ( 2010 ) = 2.0 Billion = 20 ,00,00,000
Number of users visiting AmitBhawani.com = 20,00,00,000 * 0.03 /100 = 60,000
Thus we got a Alexa formula here , all we have to do is to multiply ” reach value ” with 20,00,000 and we will get total number of visitors visiting that website daily.
STEP 4 - Now the next step is to click on the Pageviews/users tab and get the average page views per users for that website.
alexa page views
Now here the average page view per user for this website in the figure is 3.900000, i.e. 3.9 page view per user.
Hence total page impression = 60,000 * 3.9 = 2, 34, 000 for amitbhawani.com.
Final Step – After we got the total page impression for a website, we can get the total revenue of that website if we knew Adsense ecpm for that website.  Adsense revenue differ with category and demography of websites .For those who don’t know eCpm , its average revenue per 1000 impressions. Now here we will have to look that in which category the website falls.
  1. Entertainment -  [ Celebrities, jokes, SMS, wallpapers, ringtones etc ] – Average eCpm = $1
  2. General – [Politics, Health, jobs etc] – Average eCpm = $2.5
  3. Tech – (Gadgets , PC Tips , web design  etc ) = $4
AmitBhawani.com writes on a variety of topic  hence average eCpm will be $2.5 here. The page impression we calculated is 2,34,000.
Hence  the total income from adsense from amitbhawani.com is equal to ecpm * page impression .
$ ( 2.5 * 2,34,000 / 1000 ) = $522 / day
Hence the Answer to the total income perday for Amitbhwani.com is $522 / day. That translates to a whopping $15,000 per moth approximately. Thats a hell lot of money you can earn from blogging and that too in india.
Some people may argue that the adsense income given on amitbhawani.com is lower from the figure quoted here. For those i just want to say that Amit gives a lot of share of his advertising to other adsense alternatives like kontera and other affiliates. That surely takes your clicks away from Adsense and decreases CTR. The figure i calculated here only gives statistics when solely Adsense is used. Even if my calculation seems wrong, blame it on Alexa.

credit given to merabheja.com

Facebook advertising vs Google adwords

facebook is number 2 ranked website in world with huge number of users. People in US open and check their facebook updates even before picking up toothbrushes. Initially for kids it have spread to all age groups and interests but a large number of users are sill from schools and colleges. Nowadays people are experimenting with facebook ads as compared to Google adwords. Reason being Adwords are sometime way beyond your wallet’s reach for certain keywords.
Whatever you choose,  but choose it in accordance with your product need. Its not like that this is better or that is not. Its about what is better for you.
Why Facebook ?
  • Advertising on facebook is cheap as compared to adwords. On an average it costs one fourth of the amount you spend on Google.
  • You can refine your ad serving much better in facebook as compared to google. You can choose age, interests, location etc. on facebook.
  • With Google adwords (Search advertising) you can only target users who want your product. But you will never reach users who don’t know about your product. Its a sort of demand creation.
  • Facebook ads are quite effective for love and dating websites.
Why Google ?
  • Visitors generated can be more targeted and engaging.
  • Google is for conversion while facebook is for building brands.
  • Scalable results can be achieved in very short span of time, but you should have that thing called money.
credit given to merabheja.com

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Facebook Says It’s NOT Shutting Down March 15

There’s a silly rumor exploding on the Internet this weekend, alleging that Facebook is shutting down on March 15 because CEO Mark Zuckerberg “wants his old life back,” and desires to “put an end to all the madness.”
[UPDATE] We have official confirmation from Facebook Director of Corporate Communications Larry Yu that the rumor is false. We asked him via e-mail if Facebook (Facebook) was shutting down on March 15, to which he responded, “The answer is no, so please help us put an end to this silliness.” He added, “We didn’t get the memo about shutting down and there’s lots to do, so we’ll just keep cranking away like always.”
Let’s think about this for a minute. Would Facebook decide to shut down the company just a few days after announcing a round of funding, consisting of $450 million from Goldman Sachs and $50 million from Russian investment firm Digital Sky Technologies, on a valuation of $50 billion?
The spurious report was started by a site to which we refuse to link, known for its reports of impending attacks of alien spaceships and false reports of a Michelle Obama pregnancy.
The fact that this absurd hoax spread so efficiently makes us wonder: Will people believe anything?

credit given to mashable.com

About Appleface.co



About Appleface.co
Founded in Sept 2010, Appleface.co will be focusing on news related to Social Media, digital media & Technology. Website is still under construction. Please visit us soon


What you will find over here?

You will find the latest & breaking news related to Social Media, Technology, Hollywood Celebrities, Latest Gadgets, and International Business